Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy for the Palliation of Gastric Outlet Obstruction (GOO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Different Techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is usually associated with a poor prognosis and a significant decrease in a patient's quality of life. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has emerged as a safe and effective palliation procedure for GOO in patients that are unfit for surgery. Without an exclusive gold-standard technique for EUS-GE, we aimed to compare the currently available ones in this systematic review and meta-analysis, the first on this subspecialty. METHODS: A comprehensive search from multiple electronic databases was performed. The search had a particular emphasis on the techniques used in performing EUS-GE. We identified all the studies in which EUS-GE was performed as palliation for GOO from its inception to the current date. The outcomes analyzed were the following: technical and clinical success, total and severe adverse events (AEs), procedure duration, and length of hospital stay (LOHS). RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 863 patients were the basis of this statistical analysis. Patients underwent the following techniques: direct gastroenterostomy (DGE) (n=718), balloon-assisted gastroenterostomy (BAGE) (n=27), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass (n=118). In comparison to balloon-assisted techniques, DGE had a lower rate of AEs, -0.121 (95% CI -0.191 to -0.051 p=0.001); and LOHS for the DGE group, -2.684 (95% CI -1.031 to -4.337 p=0.001). The other analyzed outcomes presented no statistically significant differences. On a sub-analysis, BAGE showed a lower rate of AEs than EUS-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass, -0.196 (95% CI -0.061 to -0.331 p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-GE is a safe and effective procedure for palliating GOO. When correctly administered, any of the analyzed techniques may be used to palliate GOO with similar technical and clinical outcomes. DGE had significantly lower rates of AEs and LOHS, which can be inferred as a safer procedure. These results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited few studies that are available and accessible. Therefore, further well-designed, randomized clinical studies on the topic are warranted to compare the different techniques from more sources.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Directed Transgastric ERCP in Patients With Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a therapeutic procedure for skilled endoscopists that can be even more challenging in some situations, including patients' post-Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) surgery. There is still no consensus on whether laparoscopic-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) is the most appropriate, safe, and feasible approach in patients with this type of post-surgical anatomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine both approaches' feasibility, efficacy, and safety in this situation. We searched for electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, Google Scholar, and Central Cochrane) to identify studies comparing LA-ERCP versus EDGE. Outcomes measured included technical success, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs, length of stay (LOS), and procedural time. Descriptive data related to the EDGE procedure was also extracted. The risk of bias and the quality of evidence of the enrolled studies were assessed. Five studies, totalizing 268 patients (176 LA-ERCP and 92 EDGE), were included. There was no statistical difference in technical success and AEs between groups; however, the LOS and procedural times were shorter for the EDGE group. High rates of fistula closure and no weight regain were observed in EDGE. Both methods are feasible and safe techniques to perform ERCP in patients with RYGB anatomy, with comparable technical success and adverse events rate. However, EDGE is associated with shorter LOS and procedural time.

Obesity Treatment with Botulinum Toxin-A Is Not Effective: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The effectiveness of gastric injections of botulinum toxin-A (BTA) as primary treatment for obesity is not well known since results in literature are discrepant. Hence, we aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the available data to assess the real effect of BTA therapy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, SCOPUS, EBSCO, LILACS, and BVS. We considered eligible only randomized controlled trials enrolling obese patients comparing BTA versus saline injections. Our initial search identified 8811 records. Six studies fulfilled eligibility criteria. After critical appraisal, two articles were excluded and we meta-analyzed the remainder. The mean difference for absolute weight loss and BMI reduction were 0.12 [CI 95%, - 1.14, 1.38] and - 0.06 [95% CI, - 0.92, 0.81], respectively. Therefore, we concluded that treatment of obesity with BTA is not effective.

Initial experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection in Brazil to treat early gastric and esophagheal cancer: a multi-institutional analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinicopathological characteristics of early gastric and esophageal cancers treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at five centers in Brazil. METHODS: Five centers in Brazil reported their initial experience with ESD. The cases reported had already been collected by each center before pooled analysis. RESULTS: Were resected 62 gastric lesions; 52(83,8%) of the gastric lesions were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 31(50%) from the antrum, 24 (38.7%) type IIa. 51 (82.2%) lesions had en-block resection with three showing lateral margin compromise. Concerning invasion, 25 (40.3%) tumors were M1. Mean tumor diameter was 18.9 mm (range, 0.6-5.0 cm) and mean procedure duration was 119.45 minutes. Gastric perforation occurred in three (4.8%) patients. Mean follow-up duration was 11.3 months, with two local recurrences and one death from pneumonia Seven months after treatment. Of the 16 esophageal lesions resected, 14 (87.4%) were squamous cell carcinoma, 10 (62.5%) were located proximally and 8 (50.0%) type IIa. Mean tumor diameter was 23.8 mm (range, 6-60 mm). Thirteen (81.2%) lesions had en-block resection with five cases of lateral margin compromise. Eight (50.0%) lesions were M1. Mean procedure duration was 78 minutes (range, 20-150 min). Complications included pneumomediastinum in two (12.5%) patients and stenosis in one (6.2%). Mean duration of follow-up was 8.6 months, with no local recurrence despite the presence of lateral margin compromise. CONCLUSION: Different centers in Brazil feasibly perform ESD with a high success rate.

INITIAL EXPERIENCE OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION IN BRAZIL TO TREAT EARLY GASTRIC AND ESOPHAGHEAL CANCER: a multi-institutional analysis

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinicopathological characteristics of early gastric and esophageal cancers treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at five centers in Brazil. Methods Five centers in Brazil reported their initial experience with ESD. The cases reported had already been collected by each center before pooled analysis. Results Were resected 62 gastric lesions; 52(83,8%) of the gastric lesions were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 31(50%) from the antrum, 24 (38.7%) type IIa. 51 (82.2%) lesions had en-block resection with three showing lateral margin compromise. Concerning invasion, 25 (40.3%) tumors were M1. Mean tumor diameter was 18.9 mm (range, 0.6-5.0 cm) and mean procedure duration was 119.45 minutes. Gastric perforation occurred in three (4.8%) patients. Mean follow-up duration was 11.3 months, with two local recurrences and one death from pneumonia Seven months after treatment. Of the 16 esophageal lesions resected, 14 (87.4%) were squamous cell carcinoma, 10 (62.5%) were located proximally and 8 (50.0%) type IIa. Mean tumor diameter was 23.8 mm (range, 6-60 mm). Thirteen (81.2%) lesions had en-block resection with five cases of lateral margin compromise. Eight (50.0%) lesions were M1. Mean procedure duration was 78 minutes (range, 20-150 min). Complications included pneumomediastinum in two (12.5%) patients and stenosis in one (6.2%). Mean duration of follow-up was 8.6 months, with no local recurrence despite the presence of lateral margin compromise. Conclusion Different centers in Brazil feasibly perform ESD with a high success rate. .

Objectivo Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar a viabilidade da técnica de dissecção endoscópica da submucosa (DES) no tratamento do câncer precoce do estômago e do esôfago, assim como as características clinicopatológicas dos pacientes tratados em diferentes centros no Brasil. Métodos Cinco centros no Brasil relataram sua experiência inicial com a técnica de DES. Os casos relatados vinham sendo coletados em cada serviço antes da análise agrupada dos dados. Resultados Foram ressecadas 62 lesões gástricas, sedo 52 (83,8%) adenocarcinoma bem diferenciado, 31 (50%) localizadas no antro e 24 (38.7%) do tipo macroscópico IIa. Foram ressecadas em monobloco 51 (82.2%) lesões, com 3 apresentando margem lateral comprometida. Quanto ao grau de invasão, 25 (40.3%) eram restritas ao epitélio da mucosa (M1). O diâmetro médio das lesões foi de 18.9 (6-50) mm, o tempo médio dos procedimentos foi de 119.45 minutos. A incidência de perfuração gástrica foi de 4,8% (três casos). O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 11.3 meses, com duas recorrências locais e uma morte por pneumonia 7 meses após o tratamento. Das 16 lesões esofágicas ressecadas, 14 (87.4%) eram carcinoma epidermóide, 10 (62.5%) localizados na porção proximal, 8 (50.0%) do tipo macroscópico IIa. O diâmetro médio das lesões foi de 23.8 (6-60) mm. Foram ressecadas em monobloco 13 (81.2%) lesões, sendo que 5 apresentaram margem lateral comprometida e 8 (50.0%) com invasão restrita a camada epitelial (M1). A duração média dos procedimentos foi de 78 (20-150) minutos. Dois (12.5%) pacientes tiveram pequeno pneumomediastino e um (6.2%) evoluiu com estenose esofágica. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 8.6 meses, ...

Treatment of ring slippage after gastric bypass: long-term results after endoscopic dilation with an achalasia balloon (with videos).

BACKGROUND: Silastic rings are used in gastric bypass procedures for the treatment of obesity, but ring slippage may lead to gastric pouch outlet stenosis (GPOS). Conventional management has been ring removal through abdominal surgery. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel, safe, minimally invasive, endoscopic technique for the treatment of GPOS caused by ring slippage after gastric bypass. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Federal University of Pernambuco and São Paulo University. PATIENTS: This study involved 39 consecutive patients who were screened for inclusion. INTERVENTION: Endoscopic dilation with an achalasia balloon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Technical success and safety of the procedure. RESULTS: Among the 39 patients, 35 underwent endoscopic dilation at the ring slippage site for the relief of GPOS. The 4 patients who did not undergo endoscopic dilation underwent surgical removal of the ring, based on the exclusion criteria. The endoscopic approach was successful in 1 to 4 sessions in 100% of cases with radioscopic control (n = 12). The duration of the procedures ranged from 5 to 30 minutes, and the average internment was 14.4 hours. Dilation promoted either rupture (65.7%) or stretching (34.3%) of the thread within the ring, thereby increasing the luminal diameter of the GPOS. Complications included self-limited upper digestive tract hemorrhage (n = 1) and asymptomatic ring erosion (n = 4). There were no recurrences of obstructive symptoms during the follow-up period (mean of 33.3 months). LIMITATIONS: This was not a randomized, comparison study, and the number of patients was relatively small. CONCLUSION: The technique described promotes the relief of GPOS with low overall morbidity and avoids abdominal reoperation for ring removal.

Assesment of placement of the esophageal self-expandable metallic stent in esophageal cancer in patients with or without citorreduction therapy / Avaliação do emprego de prótese metálica auto-expansível no câncer avançado do esôfago em pacientes com ou sem terapia citorredutora

BACKGROUND: Placement of self-expanding metallic esophageal stent in patients with advanced esophageal cancer offers excellent palliation of dysphagia and tracheo-esophageal fistulas. However, the safety of stent in patients undergoing radio and/or chemotherapy is controversial, in terms of the greater risk of complications in cases where these two treatments are used in conjunction. AIM: To assess the use of stent in patients with advanced cancer of the mid-thoracic esophagus, by comparing patients undergoing cytoreductive therapy with patients who have not undergone this treatment, in relation to improvement in the dysphagia, rate of complications, period of effectiveness and survival time. METHODS: Fifty seven patients were evaluated retrospectively (16 women and 41 men, with an average age 62 years) with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the mid-thoracic esophagus who underwent placement of the Ultraflex™ self-expandable metallic coated stent, at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit of São Paulo University Medical School between October 1988 and October 2004. Out of the 57 patients, 24 patients received adjuvant cytoreductive therapy, and 33 patients were only treated with the stent placement. RESULTS: After stent placement, there was improvement in dysphagia in both groups; there were no differences in the rate of complications, such as migration, pain, fistula, obstruction and compression of the airways; the period of effectiveness was significantly higher in the group submitted to cytoreductive therapy (average 123 days compared to 63 days), as was the survival time (average of 210 days, compared with 120 days). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in dysphagia was statistically significant in both groups, irrespective of whether the patient had undergone adjuvant cytoreductive therapy; there were no differences in the rate of complications between the two groups and both the period of effectiveness of the stent treatment and the survival time were higher in the group with adjuvant cytoreductive therapy.

RACIONAL: A colocação de stent esofágico metálico e auto-expansível em pacientes com câncer esofágico avançado oferece boa paliação para disfagia e fístulas traqueoesofágicas. No entanto, a segurança do stent em pacientes submetidos à rádio e/ou quimioterapia é controversa, podendo gerar maior risco de complicações em casos onde estes dois tratamentos são utilizados em conjunto. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o uso de stent em pacientes com câncer médio-torácico de esôfago avançado, comparando os pacientes submetidos à terapia citoredutora aos que não foram submetidos a este tratamento, com relação a melhora da disfagia, índice de complicações, período de efetividade e tempo de sobrevivência. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliadaos retrospectivamente 57 pacientes (16 mulheres e 41 homens, com idade média de 62 anos) com carcinoma de células escamosas avançado na região esofágica médio-torácica. Estes foram submetidos à colocação do stent metálico auto-expansível Ultraflex™, na Unidade de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo durante outubro de 1988 a outubro de 2004. De um total de 57 pacientes, 24 receberam terapia citoredutora adjuvante e 33 somente o tratamento através da colocação de stent. RESLTADOS: Após a colocação do stent, houve melhora com relação a displasia em ambos os grupos; não houve diferenças com relação ao índice de complicações, como enxaquecas, dores, fístulas, obstrução e compressão das vias aéreas; o período de efetividade foi significativamente maior no grupo submetido à terapia citoredutora (média de 123 dias comparados à 63 dias), assim como no tempo de sobrevivência (média de 210 dias comparados a 120). CONCLUSÃO: Melhora estatisticamente significante foi encontrada em ambos os grupos com relação à displasia, independentemente se o paciente foi submetido ou não à terapia citoredutora adjuvante; não houve diferenças quanto ao índice de complicações entre os dois grupos e tanto o período de efetividade do tratamento com stent como o tempo de sobrevivência foram maiores no grupo com terapia citoredutora adjuvante.

Endoscopic therapeutics in the malignant esophageal disease

O cancer epidermoide esofagico e uma das neoplasias mais comuns do aparelho digestivo. O abuso de alcool e tabaco, quase sempre presente, e a associacao com outras doencas, fazem da resseccao cirurgica opcao pouco atraente. Para os pacientes com invasao de estruturas vasculares ou respiratorias, a paliacao da disfagia pode ser obtida atraves de metodo rapido, seguro, eficaz e duradouro. No momento, nao existe esse metodo. Dentre as varias opcoes por via endoscopica, destacam-se a dilatacao, os metodos de destruicao tumoral e a passagem de proteses. A associacao deles, aplicada caso a caso, parece ser a abordagem mais racional. As proteses auto expansiveis reduziram as complicacoes precoces relacionadas a dilatacao do tumor, especialmente a perfusao. Por outro lado, migracao e oclusao destas proteses ainda ocorrem com alguma frequencia. Finalmente, a resseccao endoscopica de tumores precoces do esofago tem sido adotada em pacientes de alto risco cirurgico...